The Liar Paradox Is A Self-Referential Conundrum

The Liar Paradox Is A Self-Referential Conundrum

The liar paradox, also known as the liar sentence, states "this sentence is false." If that statement makes you go a little crazy, you're not the first one. The liar paradox first came about in ancient Greece, and philosophers have been puzzling over it ever since. It's even said that the gravestone of scholar Philetas of Cos, from the third century B.C.E., is engraved with the words "'Twas the Liar who made me die, And the bad nights caused thereby."

There are many other versions of this ancient puzzle. The French philosopher Jean Buridan used its contradictory logic in his proof of God's existence: "God exists. None of the sentences in this pair are true." There's also the self-referential chain, "The following sentence is true. The following sentence is true. The first sentence in this list is false."

Here's why the liar paradox causes philosophers so much grief: if the sentence is true, then it must be false. But if the sentence is false, then it must be true. That's what makes it a paradox. It's an argument that leads to a self-contradictory conclusion. There are probably as many schools of thought on how to solve this paradox as there are philosophers in the world, but one thing is true (not false!): it highlights the limitations of classical logic. Puzzle over potential solutions to the paradox with the video below.

How To Resolve The Liar's Paradox

Here's philosopher Steve Patterson's take on the ancient contradiction.

04:51

Zeno's Paradoxes

Rack your brain with more conundrums from ancient Greece.

12:05

Key Facts In This Video

  • 1

    Here is Achilles and the Tortoise explained: (0:34)

Four Logical Paradoxes

Ever heard of the Ship of Theseus? What about the sorites paradox?

07:26
See all

Language

Logic

Paradoxes

Philosophy

Get smarter every day! Like us on Facebook.
You'll get the most interesting and engaging topics in your feed, straight from our team of experts.