Should We Give Nature Half Of The Planet? E.O. Wilson Says Yes.

Excited for the August 21 eclipse? Visit our Eclipse 2017 page to explore the science, history, and myths of the event. The Curiosity team will be viewing the eclipse alongside NASA in Carbondale, Illinois. Follow us on Facebook for live videos, trivia, and interviews on the big day.

E.O. Wilson, renowned biologist and author of "Half Earth: Our Planet's Fight For Life," has proposed setting aside half of the planet in the interest of conservation. He not only believes that this dream can be accomplished, but is optimistic about it, estimating that it could save between 80 and 90% of Earth's species. One thing is certain: without any drastic changes, we will see hundreds of more species go extinct, and fast. According to Wilson, about 15% of the Earth's surface and 3% of its oceans have been designated as protected zones, and humanity has an obligation to up those numbers.

Share the knowledge!

Key Facts In This Video

  1. E.O. Wilson says that a lack of emphasis on the preservation of biodiversity is a "huge strategic mistake." 04:46

  2. Hear E.O. Wilson describe why he believes humanity is capable of setting aside half of the Earth in the interest of conservation: 24:54

  3. Hear E.O. Wilson's thoughts on allowing some species to die out so that we can better support the species more likely to thrive: 49:30

If you liked this you'll love our podcast! Check it out on iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play Music, SoundCloud, search 'curiosity' on your favorite podcast app or add the RSS Feed URL.